10-25-13
After hearing Greg
and John talk about the history of design build in Storrs, it became apparent
that the goal of design-build within the SOA was something that was no longer a
major presence as it had once been. The school
had a strong relationship with studios emphasizing the design build process,
but one thing that John mentioned was that with this type of program, there
isn’t much design practice. It’s
difficult to have that balance when a class can only dedicate a few weeks to
designing a house then have to spend the rest of the semester building it. This balance was reached with the
introduction of smaller projects such as pavilions that would allow for a more
equal split of building to designing.
However, even this ended with the school saying no to new building
projects by the SOA. As a result, the
design build projects became smaller and smaller. However, these projects can still retain
their significance by ensuring that students put the same amount of attention
to detail into these projects.
The
nature of design build at an inhabitable scale is changing rapidly. Construction methods are evolving as well as
the design methods that go with them. As
a profession, we’re moving towards a more hands off way of thinking and
practicing. Tools such as CNC machines
and 3D printers are giving us the ability to create things quickly and easily
from our chairs. The next step for the
school could be in the direction of marrying the digital design with the hand
craft. The combination of the two
elements can yield an environment that is beneficial to both design approaches.
No comments:
Post a Comment